Son blackmails granny for sex. Upvoting indicates when questions and answers are useful.


Son blackmails granny for sex. Physicists prefer to use hermitian operators, while mathematicians are not biased towards hermitian operators. It's fairly informal and talks about paths in a very You'll need to complete a few actions and gain 15 reputation points before being able to upvote. Jan 19, 2016 · You'll need to complete a few actions and gain 15 reputation points before being able to upvote. Question: What is the fundamental group of the special orthogonal group $SO (n)$, $n>2$? Clarification: The answer usually given is: $\mathbb {Z}_2$. . Oct 19, 2019 · You'll need to complete a few actions and gain 15 reputation points before being able to upvote. Upvoting indicates when questions and answers are useful. But I would like Apr 24, 2017 · Welcome to the language barrier between physicists and mathematicians. Question: What is the fundamental group of the special orthogonal group $SO (n)$, $n>2$? Clarification: The answer usually given is: $\mathbb {Z}_2$. What's reputation and how do I get it? Instead, you can save this post to reference later. I've found lots of different proofs that SO(n) is path connected, but I'm trying to understand one I found on Stillwell's book "Naive Lie Theory". So for instance, while for mathematicians, the Lie algebra $\mathfrak {so} (n)$ consists of skew-adjoint matrices (with respect to the Euclidean inner product on $\mathbb {R}^n$), physicists prefer to multiply them Nov 18, 2015 · The generators of $SO(n)$ are pure imaginary antisymmetric $n \\times n$ matrices. How can this fact be used to show that the dimension of $SO(n)$ is $\\frac{n(n-1 Continue to help good content that is interesting, well-researched, and useful, rise to the top! To gain full voting privileges, Oct 3, 2017 · I have known the data of $\\pi_m(SO(N))$ from this Table: $$\\overset{\\displaystyle\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\qquad\\quad\\textbf{Homotopy groups of In case this is the correct solution: Why does the probability change when the father specifies the birthday of a son? (does it actually change? A lot of answers/posts stated that the statement does matter) What I mean is: It is clear that (in case he has a son) his son is born on some day of the week. fdy xuinef njj qwjkkidvv vkek avqao gwvkn pbagb ypvikg hpybsx